Cardiac <i>Fgf-16</i> Expression Supports Cardiomyocyte Survival and Increases Resistance to Doxorubicin Cytotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 16 gene is preferentially expressed by cardiomyocytes after birth with levels increasing into adulthood. Null mice and isolated heart studies suggest a role for FGF-16 in cardiac maintenance and survival, including increased resistance to doxorubicin (DOX)-induced injury. A single treatment with DOX was also shown to rapidly deplete endogenous rat FGF-16 mRNA at 6 h in both adult heart and neonatal cardiomyocytes. However, the effect of DOX on rat cardiac function at the time of decreased FGF-16 gene expression and the effect of FGF-16 availability on cardiomyocyte survival, including in the context of acute DOX cytotoxicity, have not been reported. The objective was to assess the effect of acute (6 and 24 h) DOX treatment on cardiac function and the effects of FGF-16 small interfering RNA "knockdown," as well as adenoviral overexpression, in the context of acute DOX cytotoxicity, including cardiomyocyte survival and DOX efflux transport. A significant decrease in heart systolic function was detected by echocardiography in adult rats treated with 15 mg DOX/kg at 6 h; however, unlike FGF-16, there was no change in atrial natriuretic peptide transcript levels. Both systolic and diastolic dysfunctions were observed at 24 h. In addition, specific FGF-16 "knockdown" in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes results in a significant increase in cell death. Conversely, adenoviral FGF-16 overexpression was associated with a significant decrease in cardiomyocyte injury as a result of 1 μM DOX treatment. A specific increase in efflux transporter gene expression and DOX efflux was also seen, which is consistent with a reduction in DOX cytotoxicity. Finally, the increased efflux and decreased DOX-induced damage with FGF-16 overexpression were blunted by inhibition of FGF receptor signaling. These observations are consistent with FGF-16 serving as an endogenous cardiomyocyte survival factor, which may involve a positive effect on regulating efflux transport to reduce cardiotoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".