KEYNOTE-412: Pembrolizumab (pembro) in combination with chemoradiation versus chemoradiation alone in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS6090 Background: Approximately half of patients (pts) with HNSCC are diagnosed with locally advanced disease and treated with surgery or concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin. Unfortunately, disease recurs in 40% to 60% of patients. The PD-l inhibitor pembro is approved for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. CRT has immunomodulatory effects; preclinical data suggest that efficacy can be improved by adding pembro. The phase 3 KEYNOTE-412 trial (NCT03040999) will explore if CRT + pembro can improve outcomes of pts with LA-HNSCC. Methods: Adult pts with newly diagnosed, pathologically proven, treatment-naive LA-HNSCC will be enrolled. Study population will include p16-negative HNSCC (any T3-T4 or any N2a-N3 [AJCC 7th edition]) and p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (any T4 or any N3). Other eligibility criteria: measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), provision of tumor sample for biomarker analyses, ECOG PS 0 or 1, and eligible for definitive CRT but not considered for primary surgery. Pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either pembro 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) plus CRT, which includes radiotherapy (RT; accelerated [70 Gy, six 2 Gy fractions/wk] or standard [70 Gy, five 2 Gy fractions/week] fractionation) plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W for 3 cycles only, or placebo Q3W plus CRT. Pts will be stratified by RT regimen, tumor site/p16 status, and disease stage. Treatment will continue until centrally confirmed disease progression, unacceptable AEs, decision to withdraw by pt or investigator, or completion of 17 doses of pembro/placebo. Disease status will be evaluated by CT or MRI 12 weeks after end of CRT, every 4 months during the next 2 years, and then every 6 months during years 3-5. Pts will be evaluated for neck dissection at 12 weeks after CRT. AEs will be monitored and graded using CTCAE v4.0 throughout the trial and for 30 days (90 days for serious AEs) after end of treatment. Primary efficacy end point is event-free survival per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Key secondary end points: overall survival, quality of life, and safety and tolerability of pembro. Approximately 780 pts will be enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03040999.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Randomized trial | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Randomized trial | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".