MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A phase I single arm, open label clinical trial evaluating safety of MAGE-A10<sup>c796</sup>T in subjects with advanced or metastatic head and neck, melanoma, or urothelial tumors (NCT02989064).

2017· article· en· W2891337611 on OpenAlexaff
David S. Hong, Marcus O. Butler, Ryan J. Sullivan, Connie L. Erickson‐Miller, Trupti Trivedi, Karen Chagin, Arundathy N. Bartlett-Pandite, Rafael G. Amado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)MelanomaInternal medicineCyclophosphamideOncologyHead and neck cancerImmunotherapyCancerChemotherapyUrologySurgeryCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS3098 Background: MAGE-A10 is a cancer/testis antigen that has been identified in 42, 26 and 17% of urothelial, melanoma and head and neck tumors, respectively. This study will evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of genetically engineered affinity enhanced autologous MAGE-A10c796T cells directed towards a MAGE-A10 peptide expressed on tumors in the context of HLA *02:01 and/or *02:06. Methods: This first-in-human T cell dose escalation study utilizes a modified 3+3 design to evaluate safety, including dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary objectives include anti-tumor activity (overall response, duration of response, time to response, PFS, OS) and translational research assessments. Patients are screened under a separate protocol (NCT02636855). Those who are HLA*02:01 and/or *02:06 positive and have inoperable or metastatic (advanced) urothelial cancer, melanoma, or squamous cell head and neck tumors with MAGE-A10 expression and meet all other entry criteria are eligible for treatment. Patients must have received standard of care therapies and have progressive disease. Following apheresis, the T cells are isolated and expanded with CD3/CD28 beads, transduced with a lentiviral vector containing the MAGE-A10c796 TCR, and infused into the subject (Day 1) after receiving lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2/day, on days -7, -6 and -5). The DLT observation period will be during the first 30 days following the infusion of MAGE-A10c796T for each patient in all groups. Up to 10 patients will be enrolled at the target dose. Disease assessments will be conducted at week 6, 12, 18 and 24, and then every 3 months until confirmation of disease progression. On study tumor biopsies and blood samples will be evaluated to compare the pre- and post-T cell infusion immune profile for association with treatment outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT02989064. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.287
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→