MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895961390 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy279.399

Initial results from a phase I/IIa trial evaluating BMS-986158, an inhibitor of the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins, in patients (pts) with advanced cancer

2018· article· en· W2895961390 on OpenAlexaff
John Hilton, Mihaela Cristea, Mark Voskoboynik, Sophie Postel‐Vinay, William J. Edenfield, Ashvinikumar V. Gavai, Susan Wee, Navin Srivastava, Anke Klippel, DavidG. Jackson, Abraham Apfel, Scott D. Chasalow, Daphne Williams, Mark Donovan, Brigitte Fischer, Sophia K. Khaldoyanidi, Jennifer R. Diamond

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBromodomainPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsCancerInternal medicinePharmacologyMucositisGastroenterologyToxicityOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Tumor cells harboring select genetic abnormalities (eg, BRD3/4-NUT) have shown sensitivity to BET inhibition. BMS-986158, a potent, selective and orally bioavailable BET inhibitor (BETi) was active in several established and pt-derived tumor xenograft models (Gavai AV, et al. AACR 2018; Wee S, et al. AACR 2018). Here we present initial data for BMS-986158 monotherapy from a phase 1/2a trial in previously treated pts with advanced cancer (NCT02419417).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of OncologySame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207