MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895961390 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy279.399

Initial results from a phase I/IIa trial evaluating BMS-986158, an inhibitor of the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins, in patients (pts) with advanced cancer

2018· article· en· W2895961390 on OpenAlexaff
John Hilton, Mihaela Cristea, Mark Voskoboynik, Sophie Postel‐Vinay, William J. Edenfield, Ashvinikumar V. Gavai, Susan Wee, Navin Srivastava, Anke Klippel, DavidG. Jackson, Abraham Apfel, Scott D. Chasalow, Daphne Williams, Mark Donovan, Brigitte Fischer, Sophia K. Khaldoyanidi, Jennifer R. Diamond

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBromodomainPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsCancerInternal medicinePharmacologyMucositisGastroenterologyToxicityOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Tumor cells harboring select genetic abnormalities (eg, BRD3/4-NUT) have shown sensitivity to BET inhibition. BMS-986158, a potent, selective and orally bioavailable BET inhibitor (BETi) was active in several established and pt-derived tumor xenograft models (Gavai AV, et al. AACR 2018; Wee S, et al. AACR 2018). Here we present initial data for BMS-986158 monotherapy from a phase 1/2a trial in previously treated pts with advanced cancer (NCT02419417). Methods: During dose escalation, pts received BMS-986158 (0.75, 1.25, 2.0, 3.0, or 4.5 mg) once daily across 3 schedules: A (5 days on/2 days off), B (14 days on/7 days off), or C (7 days on/14 days off). Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and safety were evaluated. Results: As of March 20, 2018, 68 pts (median age, 59) received BMS-986158 (A [n = 31], B [n = 8], or C [n = 29]); 43% of pts had ≥ 4 prior therapies. Initial PK analysis of BMS-986158 showed dose-proportional and linear increase in exposure, with fast absorption (Tmax 2-4 h), long half-life (T1/2 33-82 h), and dose-dependent AUC. Treatment(tx)-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 63% of pts (Gr 3-4, 22%). TRAEs (any Gr; Gr 3-4) reported in ≥ 15% of pts were mild diarrhea (34%; 0%), thrombocytopenia (28%; 15%), and fatigue (16%; 1.5%). No tx-related deaths or discontinuations due to a TRAE occurred. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Effects of BMS-986158 on gene transcription for biomarkers of BET activity (eg, CCR2 and HEXIM1) in peripheral blood cells were dose dependent and reversible with the 4.5-mg dose resulting in the highest change in gene expression. Of 4 pts with NUT midline carcinoma, an aggressive and fatal disease, 1 pt with a BRD3-NUT fusion received BMS-986158 (2.0 mg, schedule A) for 279 days, with best overall response of stable disease and 16% reduction in tumor burden, providing further evidence of target-mediated effects. Conclusions: BMS-986158 was well tolerated, with reversible thrombocytopenia as the only DLT. This safety profile together with initial PK findings and effect on target gene expression support the ongoing evaluation of BMS-986158 in pts with select advanced cancers. Editorial acknowledgement: Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Kathy Covino, PhD of Chrysalis Medical Communications, Inc., funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Legal entity responsible for the study: Bristol-Myers Squibb. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb. Disclosure: J. Hilton: Advisory board: Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli-Lilly. A. Gavai, S. Wee, N. Srivastava, A. Klippel, D. Jackson, A. Apfel, S.D. Chasalow, D. Williams, M. Donovan, B. Fischer, S. Khaldoyanidi: Employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Stock ownership: Bristol-Myers Squibb. J.R. Diamond: Grants: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Millennium Takeda, Immunomedics, Merck, Taiho, Rexahn. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of OncologySame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207