E3 ubiquitin ligases <scp>LNX</scp> 1 and <scp>LNX</scp> 2 localize at neuronal gap junctions formed by connexin36 in rodent brain and molecularly interact with connexin36
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrical synapses in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) are increasingly recognized as highly complex structures for mediation of neuronal communication, both with respect to their capacity for dynamic short- and long-term modification in efficacy of synaptic transmission and their multimolecular regulatory and structural components. These two characteristics are inextricably linked, such that understanding of mechanisms that contribute to electrical synaptic plasticity requires knowledge of the molecular composition of electrical synapses and the functions of proteins associated with these synapses. Here, we provide evidence that the key component of gap junctions that form the majority of electrical synapses in the mammalian CNS, namely connexin36 (Cx36), directly interacts with the related E3 ubiquitin ligase proteins Ligand of NUMB protein X1 (LNX1) and Ligand of NUMB protein X2 (LNX2). This is based on immunofluorescence colocalization of LNX1 and LNX2 with Cx36-containing gap junctions in adult mouse brain versus lack of such coassociation in LNX null mice, coimmunoprecipitation of LNX proteins with Cx36, and pull-down of Cx36 with the second PDZ domain of LNX1 and LNX2. Furthermore, cotransfection of cultured cells with Cx36 and E3 ubiquitin ligase-competent LNX1 and LNX2 isoforms led to loss of Cx36-containing gap junctions between cells, whereas these junctions persisted following transfection with isoforms of these proteins that lack ligase activity. Our results suggest that a LNX protein mediates ubiquitination of Cx36 at neuronal gap junctions, with consequent Cx36 internalization, and may thereby contribute to intracellular mechanisms that govern the recently identified modifiability of synaptic transmission at electrical synapses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".