MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897914092 · doi:10.1038/s41419-018-1120-x

The Zen of XEN: insight into differentiation, metabolism and genomic integrity

2018· article· en· W2897914092 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed I. Gatie, Amy R. Assabgui, Gregory M. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Death and Disease · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteChild and Family Research InstituteOntario Institute for Regenerative MedicineWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsEpiblastEndodermHomeobox protein NANOGBiologyEmbryonic stem cellCell biologyBlastocystInner cell massTrophoblastRex1Stem cellNanog Homeobox ProteinEmbryoSOX2Induced pluripotent stem cellGeneticsEmbryogenesisPlacentaGastrulationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fertilization of the mouse egg takes place in the oviduct, and following rounds of cell divisions the blastocyst forms and is comprised of three cell lineages. The epiblast houses naive or preimplantation embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which express OCT4, NANOG, REX1, and FGF4 1 . Once implanted into the uterine wall, naïve ESCs differentiate towards primed ESCs and continue to express OCT4 and NANOG, alongside FGF5 and T 1 . Collectively, cells of the epiblast give rise to the embryo proper. As for extraembryonic lineages, the trophectoderm, which gives rise to the placenta, is made up of trophoblast stem cells (TSCs)-expressing CDX2 1 . The third lineage consist of cells that form extraembryonic endoderm (XEN), which express GATA4, GATA6, SOX7, and SOX17 2 . XEN cells differentiate into parietal or visceral endoderm cells, and are essential for the survival and patterning of the embryo 2 , 3 . Despite the many studies that have focused on the derivation, maintenance, and differentiation of naïve and primed ESCs, fewer have addressed these in regard to extraembryonic lineages, specifically XEN cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Death and DiseaseSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207