Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Disubstituted Bis‐benzimidazolium Salts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a critical issue for human health. Developing new antibiotic agents is vital for fighting persistent infections and lowering mortality rates. In this study, we designed lutidine-disubstituted bis-benzimidazolium salts (lutidine-bis-benzimidazolium core with octyl, adamantyl, and cholesteryl lipophilic side chains), and tested their antimicrobial activity, their capacity to inhibit planktonic bacterial and fungal growth, and their ability to inhibit the formation of or disrupt mature methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms. The antibiofilm activity of these salts was analyzed in terms of their lipophilicity, capacity to induce transmembrane ion transport, perturbation of the cellular membrane, and mechanism of action in the phospholipid bilayer. The synthesized compounds were not active against MRSA biofilms, as the formation of transmembrane channels had no effect on the integrity of the extracellular polymeric substance matrix and only octyl and adamantyl derivatives possessed the capacity to inhibit biofilm formation. The synthesized derivatives could be used as lead candidates for the development of anti-MRSA agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".