Wetting Behavior of Tight Rocks: From Core Scale to Pore Scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Previous measurements show mixed‐wet behavior of tight siltstone core plugs, initially saturated with air. However, the same plugs show water‐wet behavior when saturated with oil or water. This study aims at explaining these observations by investigating the effects of mineral heterogeneity and intermolecular forces acting on solid/liquid and liquid/liquid interfaces. First, we conduct pore‐scale visualizations to characterize the minerals surrounding the pores of the tight rock samples. Thin‐section and scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy analyses show the existence of multimineral pores, which can be responsible for the mixed‐wet behavior. Next, we apply the DLVO theory to investigate the intermolecular forces acting on solid/liquid and liquid/liquid interfaces. We use disjoining pressure‐distance profiles and contact angles calculated for different minerals to evaluate the stability of the thin film covering the rock grains and to explain the wettability of the core plugs during spontaneous imbibition tests. The disjoining pressure values calculated for the dry core plugs suggest similar wetting affinities toward oil and water. However, the contact angles calculated for the water‐saturated core plugs suggest the water‐wet behavior, which agrees with the countercurrent imbibition results. Finally, we measure the adhesion forces between the tip of a cantilever and (1) pure quartz slide, (2) pure calcite crystal, and (3) the rock thin section using an atomic force microscope. The values of adhesion forces measured for the thin section composed of multimineral pores are between those measured for pure quartz slide and pure calcite crystal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".