High-Yield Synthesis of a Long-Sought, Labile Ru-NHC Complex and Its Application to the Concise Synthesis of Second-Generation Olefin Metathesis Catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The controlled reaction of [RuCl2(p-cymene)](2) with H(2)IMes generates the previously challenging precatalyst and Ru synthon RuCl2(p-cymene)(H(2)IMes) (Ru-2) in 96% isolated yield. Critical to success is inhibiting premature p-cymene displacement. This is achieved by carrying out the synthesis at ambient temperatures, protected from light, and at sufficient dilutions (25 mM in THF) to enable stoichiometric control and inhibit bimolecular decomposition. The ease with which p-cymene loss can be deliberately induced, however, is key to the utility of Ru-2 in both catalysis and catalyst synthesis. The transformation of Ru-2 into two second-generation olefin metathesis catalysts is described. RuCl2(H(2)IMes)(=CH(o-C6H4-(OPr)-Pr-i)) (HII) and RuCl2(H(2)IMes)(PPh3)(=CHPh) GII' (a desirable, faster-initiating analogue of GII) are accessible in ca. 80% yield over two steps from commercially available [RuCl2(p-cymene)](2). Synthesis from RuCl2(PPh3)(3), in comparison, requires three or four steps for HII or GII', respectively, and proceeds in lower yields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".