Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults is associated with a high prevalence of hematologic and solid malignancies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disorder of histiocyte proliferation. Previous case studies suggest a higher prevalence of hematologic and solid malignancies among LCH patients, possibly due to treatment with tumorigenic agents such as etoposide. We report the first large, single-institution experience of adult LCH patients with additional malignancies to study the characteristics of these patients. METHODS: We identified 132 consecutive patients >18 years of age with histologically confirmed LCH at our center between 1990 and 2015. Demographics and detailed oncologic history were recorded to identify patients with additional malignancies. RESULTS: Of 132 adult LCH patients, 42 (32%) patients had an additional malignancy. There were 53 malignancies among the 42 patients, with 31 (58%) preceding LCH diagnosis, 11 concurrent (≤3 months; 21%) with LCH diagnosis, and 11 (21%) after. Median age was 54 years (range 28-89) with a median follow-up of 3.7 years (0.1-22.2) for this cohort. OS at 3 years was 98% in patients with LCH alone and 82% among patients with additional malignancies, with 30 (71%) alive at last follow-up. Solid tumors, lymphomas, and other hematologic malignancies were observed as follows: 39 (74%), 9 (17%), and 5 (9%). CONCLUSION: Our cohort of adult LCH patients demonstrates an unusually high number of additional malignancies. Our study includes predominantly malignancies diagnosed preceding or concurrent with LCH, suggesting a cause of malignancy independent of LCH treatment. Further exploration of the biology of this rare disease may elucidate the mechanism of frequent additional malignancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".