Integrative molecular profiling and response to chemotherapy on the COMPASS trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
188 Background: Predictive mutational and transcriptional features in advanced PDAC are needed for improved patient stratification and treatment selection. Methods: Patients (pts) on the COMPASS trial with advanced PDAC are prospectively recruited prior to first-line chemotherapy for WGS and RNAseq. Tumor tissue undergoes enrichment by laser capture microdissection with genomic analyses available within eight wks. Tumor responses and clinical outcomes in this maturing cohort were correlated with molecular characteristics. Results: 157 pts underwent a tumor biopsy between Dec 2015 and Jul 2018 with over 95% success in achieving results. 141 genomes have been reported in pts planned to receive chemotherapy; the median time from biopsy to report was 35.5 days. In the ITT population,118 pts are summarised for first-line response. The median age was 63 yrs (29-81), 55% were male, and 16% had locally advanced disease. 66 (56%) received modified FFX as first-line treatment. 25 (21%) tumors displayed the Moffitt basal-like RNA signature which associated with chemotherapy resistance, with tumor shrinkage mainly observed in the classical RNA subtype (p = 0.002). GATA6 expression (log10 scale) clearly separated Moffitt subgroups with classical tumors exhibiting high expression (p < 0.0001). GATA6 in situ hybridization strongly correlated with RNAseq, (r = 0.89, p < 0.001) with strong correlation also seen with GATA6 IHC. The median overall survival (OS) in the classical group was 8.5 mths vs. 6.6 mths in the basal-like group (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.89 p = 0.015). In those treated with mFFX, median OS was 10.1mths in classical versus 6.6mths in the basal-like subtypes, (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.63, p=0.001). 30% of pts had potentially actionable genetic alterations including BRAF variants (n = 4) and an NTRK3-EML4 fusion in KRAS WT tumors (8%). Signatures of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) were found in seven pts; two additional pts with BRCA germline variants did not exhibit somatic HRD hallmarks. Conclusions: Subsets of pts with advanced PDAC have actionable variants including those with HRD signatures and patients with KRAS WT tumors. GATA6 is a putative predictive biomarker of transcriptomic subgroups which should be incorporated in clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02750657.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".