Rapid Divergence Followed by Adaptation to Contrasting Ecological Niches of Two Closely Related Columbine Species<i>Aquilegia japonica</i>and<i>A. oxysepala</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elucidating the mechanisms underlying the genetic divergence between closely related species is crucial to understanding the origin and evolution of biodiversity. The genus Aquilegia L. has undergone rapid adaptive radiation, generating about 70 well-recognized species that are specialized to distinct habitats and pollinators. In this study, to address the underlying evolutionary mechanisms that drive the genetic divergence, we analyzed the whole genomes of two ecologically isolated Aquilegia species, A. oxysepala and A. japonica as well as their putative hybrid. Our comparative genomic analyses reveal that while the two species diverged only recently and experienced recurrent gene flow, a high level of genetic divergence is observed in their nuclear genomes. In particular, candidate genomic regions that show signature of selection differ dramatically between the two species. Given that the splitting time of the two species is broadly matched with the decrease in effective population sizes, we propose that allopatric isolation together with natural selection have preceded the interspecific gene flow in the process of speciation. The observed high genetic divergence is likely an outcome of combined effects of natural selection, genetic drift and divergent sorting of ancestral polymorphisms. Our study provides a genome-wide view of how genetic divergence has evolved between closely related species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".