A proof‐of‐concept, Phase 2 clinical trial of the gastrointestinal safety of a hydrogen sulfide‐releasing anti‐inflammatory drug
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Purpose ATB‐346 is a hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S)‐releasing anti‐inflammatory and analgesic drug. Animal studies demonstrated negligible gastrointestinal (GI) damage despite marked inhibition of COX activity and significant analgesic and anti‐inflammatory effects. In humans, ATB‐346 (250 mg once daily) was found to inhibit COX to the same extent as naproxen (550 mg twice daily). Experimental Approach Two hundred forty‐four healthy volunteers completed a 2‐week, double‐blind study, taking either ATB‐346 (250 mg once daily) or naproxen (550 mg twice daily), with upper GI ulceration being examined endoscopically. Key Results Forty‐two per cent of the subjects taking naproxen developed at least one ulcer (≥3‐mm diameter), while only 3% of the subjects taking ATB‐346 developed at least one ulcer. The two drugs produced comparable and substantial (>94%) suppression of COX activity. Subjects in the naproxen group developed more ulcers per subject than ATB‐346‐treated subjects and a greater incidence of larger ulcers (≥5‐mm diameter). The incidence of dyspepsia, abdominal pain, gastro‐oesophageal reflux, and nausea was lower with ATB‐346 than with naproxen. Subjects treated with ATB‐346 had significantly higher plasma levels of H 2 S than those treated with naproxen. Conclusions and Implications This Phase 2B study provides unequivocal evidence for a marked reduction of GI toxicity of the H 2 S‐releasing analgesic/anti‐inflammatory drug, ATB‐346, as compared to the conventional dose of naproxen that produced equivalent suppression of COX. Linked Articles This article is part of a themed section on Hydrogen Sulfide in Biology & Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.4/issuetoc
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".