Final analysis of phase III LATITUDE study in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer (NDx-HR mCNPC) treated with abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AA+P) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
141 Background: The first and second interim analyses (IA1 and IA2) of the LATITUDE study in NDx-HR mCNPC pts with addition of AA+P to ADT vs placebo (PBO)+ADT showed significant benefit in the coprimary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression free survival (rPFS), and secondary endpoints. Final OS analysis and updated safety results are presented. Methods: 1,199 pts were randomized (1:1) to AA (1 g QD) + P (5 mg QD) + ADT or PBO + ADT. Primary endpoint of OS and secondary endpoints were assessed (stratified proportional hazards model), and adverse events (AEs) were summarized from final analysis, which was planned for around 852 total death events. Results: Final analysis was conducted after a median follow-up of 51.8 mo (~22 mo from IA1) and 618 deaths were observed (275 [46%] in AA+P and 343 [57%] in PBO). Treatment was ongoing for 157 (26.3%) pts in AA+P; 72 (12.0%) crossed over from PBO to AA+P, of which 59 (81.9%) remained on treatment. AA+P treatment continued to show significant OS benefits vs PBO (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6-0.8; p<0.0001), along with significant improvements in secondary endpoints (table). Serious AEs were reported in 32.2% pts in AA+P and 25.1% in PBO. Grade 3/4 AEs of special interest (AA+P vs PBO; %) were hypertension (21.9 vs 10.5), hypokalemia (11.7 vs 1.7), hepatotoxicity (8.9 vs 3.5), cardiac disorders (3.9 vs 1) and fluid retention (0.8 vs 1). Conclusions: The final analysis continues to demonstrate a significant OS advantage of combining AA+P to ADT in NDx-HR mCNPC pts. These efficacy findings and AE profiles are consistent with IA1 and IA2 and reinforce AA+P as a standard of care in NDx-HR mCNPC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01715285. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".