MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922197312 · doi:10.1161/atvb.38.suppl_1.125

Abstract 125: Intensive Statin Therapy Negatively Modulates AdipoR Activity in the Monocyte-macrophage Lineage <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i>

2018· article· en· W2922197312 on OpenAlexaff
Karina Gasbarrino, Huaien Zheng, Stella S. Daskalopoulou

Bibliographic record

VenueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRosuvastatinStatinAtorvastatinMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyInflammationMonocyteAdiponectinPharmacologyInsulin resistanceDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Statins are widely used for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and its complications through cholesterol lowering and anti-inflammatory effects. Adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory adipokine, acts via 2 receptors, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2, to exert protective effects on the vasculature. Recently, we demonstrated that AdipoR are highly expressed on macrophages and that decreased AdipoR2 activity is associated with atherosclerotic plaque instability. We aimed to investigate whether statins can modulate AdipoR activity in the monocyte-macrophage lineage. Methods: Blood monocytes were isolated from whole blood of patients (statin-naïve vs statin users) with severe carotid atherosclerosis by a Magnetic Cell-Sorting technique. AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 mRNA expression on circulating monocytes was determined using qRT-PCR. In vitro , THP-1 macrophages were treated for 24 or 72 hours with varying doses of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin (1μM, 10μM, 60μM) to determine the effect of statins on AdipoR activity (AMPK, PPAR-α) by qRT-PCR and Western Blot analyses. Macrophage cytokine secretion (IL-1β, IL-10, IL-6, TNF-α) was assessed by electrochemiluminescence. Results: AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 mRNA expression on circulating monocytes was significantly lower by 1.36- and 1.17-fold (P<0.05), respectively, in statin users (n=157) compared to statin-naïve patients (n=37). When analyzing by statin type and dose, only patients on high doses of atorvastatin (40-80 mg) or rosuvastatin (20-40 mg) had significantly lower AdipoR expression compared to statin-naïve patients (P<0.05). Statins effects on lowering AdipoR expression was only apparent in patients with unstable but not stable plaques. In vitro , higher doses and longer exposure of macrophages to atorvastatin or rosuvastatin resulted in a greater decrease in AdipoR mRNA expression and signalling through AMPK and PPAR-α, and greater secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Conclusion: In our study, intensive statin therapy resulted in negative modulation of AdipoR expression and function. Despite their known protective properties, statins may also elicit severe adverse effects, which are often associated with long-term treatment and high doses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologySame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207