MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922490134 · doi:10.1111/ppa.13015

Improved detection and identification of the sudden oak death pathogen <i>Phytophthora ramorum</i> and the Port Orford cedar root pathogen <i>Phytophthora lateralis</i>

2019· article· en· W2922490134 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicolas Feau, Darío I. Ojeda, Stéphanie Beauseigle, Guillaume J. Bilodeau, Avneet Brar, Sandra Cervantes, Angela Dale, Braham Dhillon, Craig Hammett, Padmini Herath, Simon F. Shamoun, Clement K. M. Tsui, Philippe Tanguay, Richard C. Hamelin

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Pathology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalNatural Resources CanadaFPInnovationsCanadian Forest ServiceCanadian Food Inspection AgencyBiopterreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Resources CanadaFPInnovationsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyGenome Canada
KeywordsPhytophthora ramorumBiologyPhytophthoraPrimer (cosmetics)GenomePolymerase chain reactionOomyceteTaqManPathogenGeneticsGeneBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early detection provides the best way to prevent introduction and establishment of alien plant pathogens. Amplification of DNA by PCR has revolutionized the detection and monitoring of plant pathogens. Most of those assays rely on the amplification of a fraction of the genome of the targeted species. With the availability of whole genomes for a growing number of fungi and oomycetes it is becoming possible to compare genomes and discover regions that are unique to a target organism. This study has applied this pipeline to develop a set of hierarchical TaqMan real‐time PCR detection assays targeting DNA of all four Phytophthora ramorum lineages, and a closely related species, P. lateralis . Nine assays were generated: three targeting DNA of all P. ramorum lineages, one for each lineage of P. ramorum , one for P. lateralis and one targeting DNA of P. ramorum and P. lateralis . These assays were very accurate and sensitive, ranging from 98.7% to 100% detection accuracy of 2–10 gene copies of the targeted taxa from pure cultures or inoculated tissues. This level of sensitivity is within the lowest theoretical limit of detection of DNA . It is expected that these assays will be useful because of their high level of specificity and the ease with which they can be multiplexed because of the inherent flexibility in primer and probe design afforded by their lack of conservation in non‐target species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant PathologySame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207