Global Characterization of X Chromosome Inactivation in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dosage compensation of sex-chromosome gene expression between male and female mammals is achieved via X chromosome inactivation (XCI) by employing epigenetic modifications to randomly silence one X chromosome during early embryogenesis. Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) were reported to present various states of XCI that differ according to the expression of the long non-coding RNA XIST and the degree of X chromosome silencing. To obtain a comprehensive perspective on XCI in female hPSCs, we performed a large-scale analysis characterizing different XCI parameters in more than 700 RNA high-throughput sequencing samples. Our findings suggest differences in XCI status between most published samples of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced PSCs (iPSCs). While the majority of iPSC lines maintain an inactive X chromosome, ESC lines tend to silence the expression of XIST and upregulate distal chromosomal regions. Our study highlights significant epigenetic heterogeneity within hPSCs, which may bear implications for their use in research and regenerative therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".