MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2935772641 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01168

Initial Excited-State Structural Dynamics of dT and dA Oligonucleotide Homopentamers Using Resonance Raman Spectroscopy

2019· article· en· W2935772641 on OpenAlexafffund
Swaroop Sasidharanpillai, Glen R. Loppnow

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExcited stateNucleobaseResonance Raman spectroscopyRaman spectroscopyChemistryResonance (particle physics)PhotochemistrySpectroscopyAtomic physicsDNAOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photochemical damage of DNA is initiated by absorption of ultraviolet light, and the photoproducts are formed as a result of excited-state structural and electronic dynamics. We have used UV resonance Raman spectroscopy to measure the initial excited-state structural dynamics of homopentamers of adenosine monophosphate (3'-dApdApdApdApdAp-5') and thymidine monophosphate (3'-dTpdTpdTpdTpdTp-5') and compare them to those of the monomeric nucleobases. The resonance Raman spectra of the homopentamers are similar to those of the corresponding monomers. Initial excited-state slopes, homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadening, and other excited-state parameters were extracted by self-consistent simulation of the resonance Raman excitation profiles and absorption spectra with a time-dependent formalism and are also similar to the initial excited-state slopes and broadening in the nucleotide monomers. The lack of differences between the initial excited-state structural dynamics of the nucleotides within the pentamer and the isolated nucleobases is consistent with a model in which the formation of photochemical products in oligonucleotides and DNA is dependent on the formation of the transition-state structure within these polymers, dictated by their large-scale dynamics. These results are discussed in light of the known photochemistry of DNA and the nucleobases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207