MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942257291 · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00910

Redirecting Pore Assembly of Staphylococcal α-Hemolysin by Protein Engineering

2019· article· en· W2942257291 on OpenAlexaff
Sunwoo Koo, Stephen Cheley, Hagan Bayley

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Central Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institutes of HealthOffice of Naval ResearchUniversity of Texas at AustinU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsProteasesPore-forming toxinProteolysisChemistryProteaseCytolysisMetalloproteinaseCell biologyReceptorHemolysinChimera (genetics)Fusion proteinMatrix metalloproteinaseRecombinant DNABiochemistryToxinBiologyIn vitroCytotoxicityEnzymeMicrobial toxins

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. Upon binding to receptors on target cell membranes, αHL assembles to form heptameric membrane-spanning pores. We have previously engineered αHL to create a protease-activatable toxin that is activated by site-specific proteolysis including by tumor proteases. In this study, we redesigned αHL so that it requires 2-fold activation on target cells through (i) binding to specific receptors, and (ii) extracellular proteolytic cleavage. To assess our strategy, we constructed a fusion protein of αHL with galectin-1 (αHLG1, αHL-Galectin-1 chimera). αHLG1 was cytolytic toward cells that lack a receptor for wild-type αHL. We then constructed protease-activatable mutants of αHLG1 (PAMαHLG1s). PAMαHLG1s were activated by matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and had approximately 50-fold higher cytolytic activity toward MMP-2 overexpressing cells (HT-1080 cells) than toward non-overexpressing cells (HL-60 cells). Our approach provides a novel strategy for tailoring pore-forming toxins for therapeutic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Central ScienceSame topicToxin Mechanisms and ImmunotoxinsFrench-language works237,207