MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TAOK3, a Regulator of LCK–SHP-1 Crosstalk during TCR Signaling

2019· review· en· W2947852075 on OpenAlexafffund
João V. S. Ormonde, Yan Nie, Joaquı́n Madrenas

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Immunology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsCrosstalkT-cell receptorCell biologyRegulatorProtein tyrosine phosphataseSignal transductionEffectorImmunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifNegative regulatorProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcDownregulation and upregulationT cellTyrosine kinaseSykBiologyImmunologyBiochemistryImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signaling from the T cell receptor for antigen turns on the physiological response of a T cell. The canonical TCR signaling pathway relies on early activation of the Src kinase LCK. This step initiates a cascade of events that lead not only to the phenotypic changes that characterize effector T cells but also to the activation of negative regulatory mechanisms that stop early TCR signaling. These mechanisms ensure qualitative and quantitative fine-tuning of T cell activation. The tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 is a key player in the downregulation of LCK activation. In this review, we focus on the crosstalk between LCK and SHP-1 and, based on recent data, we introduce the putative kinase TAOK3 as an important regulator of this crosstalk. Given the widespread expression of TAOK3 and SHP-1, we propose that the function of TAOK3 extends beyond T cells and may be fundamental in the regulation of early signaling from receptors that utilize Src kinases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207