MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948582879 · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz269

Structural insights into the modulatory role of the accessory protein WYL1 in the Type VI-D CRISPR-Cas system

2019· article· en· W2948582879 on OpenAlexafffund
Heng Zhang, Dong Cheng, Li Li, Gregory A. Wasney, Jinrong Min

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleic Acids Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenStructural Genomics ConsortiumUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiologyCRISPREffectorRNARNase PComputational biologyCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Type VI-D CRISPR-Cas system employs an RNA-guided RNase Cas13d with minimal targeting constraints to combat viral infections. This CRISPR system contains RspWYL1 as a unique accessory protein that plays a key role in boosting its effector function on target RNAs, but the mechanism behind this RspWYL1-mediated stimulation remains completely unexplored. Through structural and biophysical approaches, we reveal that the full-length RspWYL1 possesses a novel three-domain architecture and preferentially binds ssRNA with high affinity. Specifically, the N-terminus of RspWYL1 harbors a ribbon-helix-helix motif reminiscent of transcriptional regulators; the central WYL domain of RspWYL1 displays a Sm-like β-barrel fold; and the C-terminal domain of RspWYL1 primarily contributes to the dimerization of RspWYL1 and may regulate the RspWYL1 function via a large conformational change. Collectively, this study provides a first glimpse into the complex mechanism behind the RspWYL1-dictated boosting of target ssRNA cleavage in the Type VI-D CRISPR-Cas system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleic Acids ResearchSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207