Abstract 409: LRRC10 Associates With and Regulates Cardiac Ca <sub>V</sub> 1.2 L-type Ca <sup>2+</sup> Channels, and I195T LRRC10 Variant is Linked to Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leucine-rich repeat containing (LRR) proteins facilitate protein-protein interactions critical in a number of cellular functions including ion channel regulation. Leucine-rich repeat containing protein 10 (LRRC10), a cardiac-specific protein expressed in zebrafish, mice and humans, is essential for normal cardiac physiology with loss of Lrrc10 in Lrrc10 -/- mice resulting in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, the mechanism by which LRRC10 contributes to DCM is unknown. Further, the functional role of LRRC10 in the regulation of ion channels in the heart has not been explored. Here we recorded L-type Ca 2+ channel currents (I Ca,L ) from isolated ventricular myocytes of WT and Lrrc10 -/- mice, demonstrating a significant reduction in I Ca,L in Lrrc10 -/- myocytes (-4.9 ± 0.19 pA/pF, n=10) compared to WT (-6.5 ± 0.24 pA/pF, n=8). Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments showed an association between LRRC10 and Ca v 1.2 in WT, but not Lrrc10 -/- mouse lysates, with immunocytochemistry studies further demonstrating colocalization of LRRC10 and Ca v 1.2 in isolated ventricular myocytes from wild-type (WT) mice. Additionally, whole exome sequencing revealed a novel homozygous recessive missense variant in LRRC10 , I195T, found in a pediatric DCM patient. To determine whether the I195T variant impacts Ca v 1.2 L-type Ca 2+ channels, whole-cell patch clamp experiments were performed using HEK293 cells transiently expressing the L-type Ca 2+ channel complex (LTCC) alone or with WT or I195T LRRC10. These electrophysiology experiments demonstrated a significant increase in I Ca,L with WT LRRC10 coexpression (-81 ± 5.3 pA/pF, n=12), but a decrease in I Ca,L when I195T (-18.2 ± 3.3 pA/pF, n=9) was coexpressed compared to the LTCC alone (-34.1 ± 2.2 pA/pF, n=17). Parallel surface biotinylation experiments demonstrated that WT and I195T LRRC10 did not alter L-type Ca 2+ channel expression on the plasma membrane, while co-IP experiments using lysates prepared from the transiently transfected HEK293 cells showed the association between Ca v 1.2 and I195T LRRC10 variant. Overall, these findings newly identify LRRC10 as a cardiac-specific component of the Ca v 1.2 macromolecular complex and demonstrate dysregulation of I Ca,L by the DCM associated I195T LRRC10 variant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".