Transposable Elements Are Important Contributors to Standing Variation in Gene Expression in Capsella Grandiflora
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) make up a significant portion of eukaryotic genomes and are important drivers of genome evolution. However, the extent to which TEs affect gene expression variation on a genome-wide scale in comparison with other types of variants is still unclear. We characterized TE insertion polymorphisms and their association with gene expression in 124 whole-genome sequences from a single population of Capsella grandiflora, and contrasted this with the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Population frequency of insertions was negatively correlated with distance to genes, as well as density of conserved noncoding elements, suggesting that the negative effects of TEs on gene regulation are important in limiting their abundance. Rare TE variants strongly influence gene expression variation, predominantly through downregulation. In contrast, rare SNPs contribute equally to up- and down-regulation, but have a weaker individual effect than TEs. An expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis shows that a greater proportion of common TEs are eQTLs as opposed to common SNPs, and a third of the genes with TE eQTLs do not have SNP eQTLs. In contrast with rare TE insertions, common insertions are more likely to increase expression, consistent with recent models of cis-regulatory evolution favoring enhancer alleles. Taken together, these results imply that TEs are a significant contributor to gene expression variation and are individually more likely than rare SNPs to cause extreme changes in gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".