MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952504636 · doi:10.1128/mbio.01861-17

The Complex Quorum Sensing Circuitry of <i>Burkholderia thailandensis</i> Is Both Hierarchically and Homeostatically Organized

2017· article· en· W2952504636 on OpenAlexafffund
Servane Le Guillouzer, Marie‐Christine Groleau, Éric Déziel

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier MuseumInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsQuorum sensingHomoserineBurkholderiaBiologyGeneTranscription (linguistics)BacteriaGeneticsCell biologyChemistryMicrobiologyVirulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The genome of the bacterium Burkholderia thailandensis encodes three complete LuxI/LuxR-type quorum sensing (QS) systems: BtaI1/BtaR1 (QS-1), BtaI2/BtaR2 (QS-2), and BtaI3/BtaR3 (QS-3). The LuxR-type transcriptional regulators BtaR1, BtaR2, and BtaR3 modulate the expression of target genes in association with various N -acyl- l -homoserine lactones (AHLs) as signaling molecules produced by the LuxI-type synthases BtaI1, BtaI2, and BtaI3. We have systematically dissected the complex QS circuitry of B. thailandensis strain E264. Direct quantification of N -octanoyl-homoserine lactone (C 8 -HSL), N -3-hydroxy-decanoyl-homoserine lactone (3OHC 10 -HSL), and N -3-hydroxy-octanoyl-homoserine lactone (3OHC 8 -HSL), the primary AHLs produced by this bacterium, was performed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the wild-type strain and in QS deletion mutants. This was compared to the transcription of btaI1 , btaI2 , and btaI3 using chromosomal mini-CTX- lux transcriptional reporters. Furthermore, the levels of expression of btaR1 , btaR2 , and btaR3 were monitored by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). We observed that C 8 -HSL, 3OHC 10 -HSL, and 3OHC 8 -HSL are differentially produced over time during bacterial growth and correlate with the btaI1 , btaI2 , and btaI3 gene expression profiles, revealing a successive activation of the corresponding QS systems. Moreover, the transcription of the btaR1 , btaR2 , and btaR3 genes is modulated by cognate and noncognate AHLs, showing that their regulation depends on themselves and on other QS systems. We conclude that the three QS systems in B. thailandensis are interdependent, suggesting that they cooperate dynamically and function in a concerted manner in modulating the expression of QS target genes through a successive regulatory network. IMPORTANCE Quorum sensing (QS) is a widespread bacterial communication system coordinating the expression of specific genes in a cell density-dependent manner and allowing bacteria to synchronize their activities and to function as multicellular communities. QS plays a crucial role in bacterial pathogenicity by regulating the expression of a wide spectrum of virulence/survival factors and is essential to environmental adaptation. The results presented here demonstrate that the multiple QS systems coexisting in the bacterium Burkholderia thailandensis , which is considered the avirulent version of the human pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei and thus commonly used as an alternative study model, are hierarchically and homeostatically organized. We found these QS systems to be finely integrated into a complex regulatory network, including transcriptional and posttranscriptional interactions, and further incorporating growth stages and temporal expression. These results provide a unique, comprehensive illustration of a sophisticated QS network and will contribute to a better comprehension of the regulatory mechanisms that can be involved in the expression of QS-controlled genes, in particular those associated with the establishment of host-pathogen interactions and acclimatization to the environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFrench-language works237,207