Solid-State and Solution Rearrangements of F<sub>3</sub>S≡NXeF<sup>+</sup>Leading to the F<sub>4</sub>S═NXe<sup>+</sup>Cation; Syntheses, HF Solvolyses, and Structural Characterizations of [F<sub>4</sub>S═NXe][AsF<sub>6</sub>] and [F<sub>4</sub>S═NH<sub>2</sub>][AsF<sub>6</sub>]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The salt, [F(4)S=NXe][AsF(6)], has been synthesized by the solid-state rearrangement of [F(3)S[triple bond]NXeF][AsF(6)] and by HF-catalyzed rearrangement of [F(3)S[triple bond]NXeF][AsF(6)] in anhydrous HF (aHF) and HF/BrF(5) solvents. The F(4)S=NXe(+) cation undergoes HF solvolysis to form F(4)S=NH(2)(+), XeF(2), and the recently reported F(5)SN(H)Xe(+) cation. Both [F(4)S=NXe][AsF(6)] and [F(4)S=NH(2)][AsF(6)] have been characterized by (129)Xe and (19)F NMR spectroscopy in aHF and HF/BrF(5) solvents and by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The [F(4)S=NXe][AsF(6)] salt was also characterized by Raman spectroscopy. The Xe-N bond of F(4)S=NXe(+) is among the shortest Xe-N bonds presently known (2.084(3) A), and the cation interacts with the AsF(6)(-) anion by means of a Xe---F-As bridge in which the Xe---F distance (2.618(2) A) is significantly less than the sum of the Xe and F van der Waals radii. Both F(4)S=NXe(+) and F(4)S=NH(2)(+) exhibit trigonal bipyramidal geometries about sulfur, with nitrogen in the equatorial plane and the nitrogen substituents coplanar with the axial fluorine ligands of sulfur. The F(4)S=NH(2)(+) cation is isoelectronic with F(4)S=CH(2) and, like F(4)S=CH(2), has a high barrier to rotation about the S=N double bond and to pseudorotation of the trigonal bipyramidal F(4)S=N- moiety. The solution and solid-state rearrangements of F(3)S[triple bond]NXeF(+) to F(4)S=NXe(+) are proposed to result from attack at sulfur by fluoride ion arising from HF in solution and from the AsF(6)(-) anion in the solid state. Quantum-chemical calculations were employed to calculate the gas-phase geometries, charges, bond orders, valencies, and vibrational frequencies of F(4)S=NXe(+) and F(4)S=NH(2)(+). The F(4)S=NXe(+) cation provides the first example of xenon bonded to an imido-nitrogen, and together with the F(4)S=NH(2)(+) cation are presently the only cations known to contain the F(4)S=N-group. Both cations are intermediates in the HF solvolysis pathways of F(3)S[triple bond]NXeF(+) which lead to F(5)SN(H)Xe(+) and F(5)SNH(3)(+), and significantly extend the chemistry of the F(4)S=N-group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".