MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953760407 · doi:10.11575/prism/36149

Searching Public Websites within Canadian Higher Education: Academic Integrity Tutorials [Infographic]

2019· article· en· W2953760407 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Elaine Eaton, Jennifer Miron, Laura E. McBreairty

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfographicAcademic integrityHigher educationAdvertisingPublic relationsWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceComputer scienceInternet privacyLibrary scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This infographic summarizes the results of a year-long research project in which the team reviewed websites of higher education institutions in Canada for information related to academic integrity tutorials and educational modules. Key findings indicate that while such tutorials are found under student services or libraries, it is often difficult to find information, requiring multiple click throughs and specific search terms. The tone of the educational material varied from supportive to punitive. As a result, our recommendations are for institutions to make academic integrity education easier to find and more transparent for students and staff.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicAcademic integrity and plagiarismFrench-language works237,207