Abstract 3880: In vivo activities of TP-2846: a novel tetracycline antileukemia agent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of TP-2846 was studied in mice, rats, and monkeys via IP, PO, and IV administration. In a mouse PK study with TP-2846 dosed IP at 10 mg/kg, C max , T 1/2 , and AUC 0-inf values of 5340 ng/mL, 6.81 h, and 5944 ng•h/mL were observed, respectively. In an IV PK study in mice, TP-2846 was dosed at 1, 3, and 6 mg/kg, and the various PK parameters at each respective dose are: C max = 1142, 5881, 8518 ng/mL; T 1/2 = 6.15, 5.15, 6.92 h; AUC 0-inf = 704, 2174, 4205 ng•h/mL. In a rat PK study, TP-2846 was dosed at 5 mg/kg IV and PO. The various PK parameters by each dosing route are: C max = 7180, 4.39 ng/mL; T 1/2 = 9.64, 9.41 h; AUC 0-inf = 9390, 21.0 ng•h/mL. In a PK study in monkeys, TP-2846 was dosed at 1, 2, 4, and 6 mg/kg IV. Key PK parameters at each respective dose are: C max = 734, 1071, 1835, 2715 ng/mL; T 1/2 = 9.97, 12.5, 15.7, 22.4 h; AUC 0-inf = 4128, 8252, 19179, 30871 ng•h/mL. TP-2846 demonstrated good half-lives and exposures across all three species. Low oral bioavailability was observed when TP-2846 was dosed in rats. Dose linearity of plasma exposure was shown when varying levels of TP-2846 was dosed in mice and monkeys. The in vivo efficacy of TP-2846 was evaluated in a number of leukemia mouse xenograft models including MV4-11, MOLT-4, CCRF-CEM, HL-60, KG-1, Kasumi-1, and K-562. TP-2846 demonstrated potent in vivo efficacy in MV4-11 with a Tumor Growth Inhibition (TGI) value of 111.4% ( p = 0.001) when dosed IP at 12.5 mg/kg, QD, 4 days on/6 days off, for two cycles, while cytarabine and tigecycline had a TGI value of 23.5% and -49.2%, respectively, at their reported optimal dosing regimens. TP-2846 was also highly efficacious in HL-60 xenograft models with a TGI value of 109.1% ( p p = 1.000), 34.73% ( p = 0.643), 103.50% ( p = 0.015), and 104.87% ( p = 0.013), respectively, when dosed at 1, 2, 4, and 6 mg/kg, QDx3, for two weeks. To understand the PK parameters that drive the efficacy of TP-2846, studies with varying dosing levels and dosing schedules were conducted in the HL-60 model. Subsequent PK/PD modeling using the resulting data sets suggested that AUC is the primary efficacy driver for TP-2846 in the xenograft model. In summary, TP-2846 displayed favorable PK profiles across multiple species and demonstrated potent, dose-responding, AUC-driven efficacy in several mouse leukemia xenograft models. These data sets, combined with other desirable in vitro , in vivo , and chemical-physical properties, support the continued pre-clinical development of TP-2846 as a new antileukemia agent. Citation Format: Xiao-Yi Xiao, Cuixiang Sun, Jian Zhou, Noriaki Tatsuta, Joseph Newman, Douglas White, Barbara Hibner, Arijit Chakravarty, Jacques Dumas. In vivo activities of TP-2846: a novel tetracycline antileukemia agent [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3880.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".