MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954390733 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000003066

A Systematic Review of Definitions for Neurological Complications and Disease Progression in Patients Treated Surgically for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

2019· review· en· W2954390733 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Tetreault, Stefan Lange, Silky Chotai, Michael T. Kryshtalskyj, Allan R. Martin, Christopher S. Ahuja, Jefferson R. Wilson, Benjamin M. Davies, Aria Nouri, Clinton J. Devin, Michael G. Fehlings

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineMyelopathyPerioperativeSurgeryMEDLINEComplicationEvidence-based medicineSystematic reviewQuality of life (healthcare)Spinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to (1) outline how neurological complications and disease progression are defined in the literature and (2) evaluate the quality of definitions using a novel four-point rating system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive, degenerative spine disease that is often treated surgically. Although uncommon, surgical decompression can be associated with neurological complications, such as C5 nerve root palsy, perioperative worsening of myelopathy, and longer-term deterioration. Unfortunately, important questions surrounding these complications cannot be fully addressed due to the heterogeneity in definitions used across studies. Given this variability, there is a pressing need to develop guidelines for the reporting of surgical complications in order to accurately evaluate the safety of surgical procedures. METHODS: An electronic database search was conducted in MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies that reported on complications related to DCM surgery and included at least 10 surgically treated patients. Data extracted included study design, surgical details, as well as definitions and rates of surgical complications. A four-point rating scale was developed to assess definition quality for each complication. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2673 unique citations, 42 of which met eligibility criteria and were summarized in this review. Defined complications included neurological deterioration, late onset deterioration, perioperative worsening of myelopathy, C5 palsy, nerve root or upper limb palsy or radiculopathy, surgery failure, inadequate decompression and progression of ossified lesions. Reported rates of these complications varied substantially, especially those for neurological deterioration (0.2%-33.3%) and progression of ossified lesions (0.0%-86.7%). CONCLUSION: Reported incidences of various complications vary widely in DCM surgery, especially for neurological deterioration and progression of ossified lesions. This summary serves as a first step for standardizing definitions and developing guidelines for accurately reporting surgical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207