MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2956092844 · doi:10.14288/1.0375876

Wood fuel from British Columbia : multi-scale assessment of the economic, energetic and environmental efficiencies of the supply chains of conventional and torrefied wood pellets

2019· article· en· W2956092844 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Huimin Yun

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPelletsTorrefactionWood fuelEnvironmental scienceWaste managementScale (ratio)Douglas firWood industrySupply chainBioenergyPulp and paper industryBiofuelEngineeringForestryBusinessPyrolysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates several key aspects of the supply systems of torrefied and conventional wood pellet (TWP/CWP) from British Columbia (BC): what are the economic, environmental, and energetic (“3E”) performances of TWPs and CWPs supplied from BC into different markets? What is the best pathway for making TWPs? Can the TWPs production process be operated auto-thermally? If so, under what operating conditions? A simulation platform is developed, including models for rotary and fluidized bed dryers, directly and indirectly heated rotary and fluidized bed torrefiers, and integrating heat and mass transfer, kinetics, particle hydrodynamics, thermodynamics and element evolutions. The auto-thermal operation boundaries are identified for the torrefaction system. The boundaries are influenced by drying technology, N₂ flowrate, biomass properties and torrefaction conditions. A heat and mass integration scheme is proposed to avoid the use of N2 for torrefaction by recycling flue gases and to expand the auto-thermal operation boundaries. CWP and TWP production processes are analyzed, revealing that torrefying the biomass before grinding can reduce the “3E” impacts significantly. Due to auto-thermal operation, electricity is the main energy consumption and contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Capital costs contribute about 10% of the total production costs, with the remaining 90% being the operating cost, within which raw material, electricity, and labor are the major components. The minimum selling price at which BC TWPs is estimated as ~$6.7/GJ, equivalent to 140$/t. The “3E” performances of BC CWP/TWPs supply chains to the UK, Japan, Ontario and Alberta are quantified with uncertainties considered. TWPs can reduce “3E” impacts by about 25% in comparison with CWPs. Transportation is the main energy consumer and GHG emission contributor, while transportation and production are the major cost stages. There is significant potential to replace coal with BC TWPs domestically and overseas, particularly in the UK, EU and Pacific Asia, due to the comparative advantages of BC’s clean electricity system and rich biomass resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.143
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207