Prevalencia y necesidad de tratamiento periodontal en gestantes atendidas en el Centro de Salud “Simón Bolívar” Cajamarca 2016.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the prevalence and need of periodontal treatment in pregnant women attended at the Simon Bolivar Health Center in the city of Cajamarca. 152 pregnant women (I, II, III trimester of pregnancy) and different age groups (15-17 years, 18-29 years, 30-50 years) were examined, the Russell Index and the Treatment Necessity Index were used. Community Periodontal (CPITN), reaching the following conclusions: Prevalence and need for periodontal treatment, Russell Index 60.6%, CPITN Index 50.7%, Need for Treatment 50.7%, Prevalence of periodontal disease according to the Russell Index by trimester of pregnancy : I Quarter on 20.04%, II Quarter 34.2% and III Quarter 5.92% (Codes 1, 2 and 6); Prevalence of periodontal disease according to the Russell Index by age group: 15-17 years 12.5%, 18-29 years 29.61% and 30-50 years 18.42% (Codes 1, 2 and 6); Prevalence of periodontal disease according to the community index of periodontal treatment needs (CPITN) by trimester of pregnancy: I Quarter on 17.11%, II Quarter 28.94% and III Quarter 4.61% (Codes 1, 2 and 3), with a need for NT I and NTII treatment; Prevalence of periodontal disease according to the community index of periodontal treatment needs (CPITN) by age group: 15-17 years 9.86%, 18-29 years 26.32% and 30-50 years 14.47% (Codes 1, 2 and 3) with a need for NT I and NTII treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".