MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960211841 · doi:10.1681/asn.2019010008

Evaluating Glomerular Filtration Rate Slope as a Surrogate End Point for ESKD in Clinical Trials: An Individual Participant Meta-Analysis of Observational Data

2019· review· en· W2960211841 on OpenAlexaff
Morgan E. Grams, Yingying Sang, Shoshana H. Ballew, Kunihiro Matsushita, Brad C. Astor, Juan Jesús Carrero, Alex R. Chang, Lesley A. Inker, Timothy Kenealy, Csaba P. Kövesdy, Brian J. Lee, Adeera Levin, David Naimark, Michelle J. Pena, Jesse D. Schold, Varda Shalev, Jack F.M. Wetzels, Mark Woodward, Ron T. Gansevoort, Andrew S. Levey, Josef Coresh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthNational Kidney Foundation
KeywordsObservational studyMeta-analysisRenal functionMedicineSurrogate endpointEnd pointUrologyClinical trialInternal medicineStatisticsIntensive care medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Statement Randomized clinical trials of treatments to slow CKD progression often require large sample sizes and long follow-up to understand their effects on clinical events. This is especially true in patients with earlier stages of kidney disease who are unlikely to experience ESKD for many years. Surrogate study end points that occur earlier during disease progression could help. To evaluate whether eGFR decline over time may be a good surrogate end point, the authors did a meta-analysis of 14 cohorts. They found that slower eGFR decline was significantly associated with lower risk of ESKD in all populations, including those with better kidney function. The results suggest that change in the slope of eGFR decline may be a good surrogate end point for ESKD in clinical trials, particularly in longer trials with patients with rapidly progressive disease. Background Decline in eGFR is a biologically plausible surrogate end point for the progression of CKD in clinical trials. However, it must first be tested to ensure strong associations with clinical outcomes in diverse populations, including patients with higher eGFR. Methods To investigate the association between 1-, 2-, and 3-year changes in eGFR (slope) with clinical outcomes over the long term, we conducted a random effects meta-analysis of 3,758,551 participants with baseline eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 and 122,664 participants with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 from 14 cohorts followed for an average of 4.2 years. Results Slower eGFR decline by 0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year over 2 years was associated with lower risk of ESKD in participants with baseline eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.72) and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (0.71; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.74). The relationship was stronger with 3-year slope. For a rapidly progressing population with predicted 5-year risk of ESKD of 8.3%, an intervention that reduced eGFR decline by 0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year over 2 years would reduce the ESKD risk by 1.6%. For a hypothetical low-risk population with a predicted 5-year ESKD risk of 0.58%, the same intervention would reduce the risk by only 0.13%. Conclusions Slower decline in eGFR was associated with lower risk of subsequent ESKD, even in participants with eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , but those with the highest risk would be expected to benefit the most.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.009
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.822
GPT teacher head0.603
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations209
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesFrench-language works237,207