PERAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI MEMEDIASI PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL TERHADAP PEMBERDAYAAN PSIKOLOGIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psychological empowerment is the employee's confidence in his ability in the process of capturing and understanding the state of the organization's environment as an act of motivation towards employees that relates to the skills and competencies they have. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of transformational leadership on psychological empowerment, the influence of transformational leadership on organizational culture, the influence of organizational culture on psychological empowerment and the role of organizational culture to mediate the influence of transformational leadership on psychological empowerment. This research was conducted at the Office of Industry and Trade in Denpasar City. The number of samples taken was 50 contract employees who had worked for at least 1 year, with a saturated sample method. Data collection is done through interviews and observations. The data analysis technique used is path analysis. The results showed that transformational leadership has a positive and significant effect on psychological empowerment, transformational leadership has a positive and significant effect on organizational culture, a positive and significant organizational culture influences psychological empowerment and the role of organizational culture mediates transformational leadership on psychological empowerment. Keywords: psychological empowerment, transformational leadership, organizational culture
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".