MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low resting diffusion capacity, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2019· article· en· W2965632267 on OpenAlexaff
Amany F. Elbehairy, Conor D. O’Donnell, Asmaa Abd-Elhameed, Sandra G. Vincent, Kathryn M. Milne, Matthew D. James, Katherine A. Webb, J. Alberto Neder, Denis E. O’Donnell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExercise intoleranceMedicinePulmonary Diffusing CapacityPulmonary diseaseCardiologyPhysical exerciseInternal medicineExertional dyspneaPhysical therapyLungDiffusing capacityLung functionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanisms linking reduced diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dl CO ) to dyspnea and exercise intolerance across the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continuum are poorly understood. COPD progression generally involves both Dl CO decline and worsening respiratory mechanics, and their relative contribution to dyspnea has not been determined. In a retrospective analysis of 300 COPD patients who completed symptom-limited incremental cardiopulmonary exercise tests, we tested the association between peak oxygen-uptake (V̇o 2 ), Dl CO , and other resting physiological measures. Then, we stratified the sample into tertiles of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) and inspiratory capacity (IC) and compared dyspnea ratings, pulmonary gas exchange, and respiratory mechanics during exercise in groups with normal and low Dl CO [i.e., <lower limit of normal (LLN)] using Global Lung Function Initiative reference values. Dl CO was associated with peak V̇o 2 ( P = 0.006), peak work-rate ( P = 0.005), and dyspnea/V̇o 2 slope ( P < 0.001) after adjustment for other independent variables (airway obstruction and hyperinflation). Within FEV 1 and IC tertiles, peak V̇o 2 and work rate were lower ( P < 0.05) in low versus normal Dl CO groups. Across all tertiles, low Dl CO groups had higher dyspnea ratings, greater ventilatory inefficiency and arterial oxygen desaturation, and showed greater mechanical volume constraints at a lower ventilation during exercise than the normal Dl CO group (all P < 0.05). After accounting for baseline resting respiratory mechanical abnormalities, Dl CO <LLN was consistently associated with greater dyspnea and poorer exercise performance compared with preserved Dl CO . The higher dyspnea ratings and earlier exercise termination in low Dl CO groups were linked to significantly greater pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, higher ventilatory demand, and associated accelerated dynamic mechanical constraints. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study demonstrated that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dl CO ) less than the lower limit of normal had greater pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, which resulted in higher ventilatory demand and greater dynamic mechanical constraints at lower ventilation during exercise. This, in turn, led to greater exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance compared with patients with normal Dl CO .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207