MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Encouraging results from a phase I study of capecitabine (X), irinotecan (I) and oxaliplatin (O) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC)

2007· article· en· W2965843521 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean A. Maroun, Derek J. Jonker, C. Cripps, Rakesh Goel, D Lister, G. Chiritescu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa Regional Cancer FoundationOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeutropeniaFebrile neutropeniaMucositisInternal medicineCapecitabineIrinotecanAnemiaGastroenterologyAdverse effectToxicityOxaliplatinColorectal cancerFOLFIRIDiarrheaPhases of clinical researchSurgeryCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4086 Background: First-line treatment with I, O and infusional 5-FU/Leucovorin (LV) triplets is associated with high response rates and long survival in MCRC. The oral fluoropyrimidine X is better tolerated and shows improved response rates vs. 5- FU/LV in MCRC. This dose-escalation study aims to establish dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II doses (RPIID) of I, O and X and to evaluate efficacy and safety in first-line. Methods: Starting doses were: I (180mg/m2 i.v. d1), O (85mg/m2 i.v. d1), × (850mg/m2 bid orally d2–15). Dose escalations are based on toxicity observed at previous dose level (DL), until DLT, MTD and RPIID are reached. Results: We have enrolled 27 pts (21 men, 6 women), median age 59 years (range 25–74), at 6 DLs. ECOG PS was 0 or 1 in 25 pts, and 2 in 2 pts. Pts received a median of 10 cycles (range 1–23). All pts are evaluable for toxicity (24 for efficacy). Most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse events (AEs) during dose escalation: granulocytopenia (41%), anemia (7%), and thrombocytopenia (15%). Most common grade 3 non-hematological AEs: late-onset diarrhea (11%), fever (14%), and fatigue (4%). DLTs at each dose level: DL1 (1 febrile neutropenia with bowel perforation); DL2 (1 grade 3 diarrhea); DL3 (1 febrile neutropenia with grade 2 edema); DL4 (1 severe febrile neutropenia in cycles 2&3, pt deceased due to sepsis); no DLTs were reported at DL5 & 6. MTD has not yet been reached. Overall response rate is 79% (95% CI, 62–97%), including 2 CRs and 17 PRs (3 still unconfirmed). Disease control rate is 92%. Two pts had subsequent curative liver resection and 4 pts are under consideration for curative procedures. Median progression-free survival is 15 months (95% CI, 8–22). Conclusions: XIO is well tolerated and highly effective as first-line treatment for MCRC. Severe neutropenia was significant but of short duration and manageable; it is likely to be the main DLT. MTD has not yet been identified but is expected shortly. A phase II study to confirm the efficacy and safety of XIO, possibly in combination with targeted agents, will follow. Supported by Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer Canada. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207