Polysomes identified by live imaging of nascent peptides are stalled in hippocampal and cortical neurites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In neurons, mRNAs can be repressed postinitiation and assembled into granules enabling the transport and later, regulated reactivation of the paused mRNAs. It has been suggested that a large percentage of transcripts in neuronal processes are stored in these stalled polysomes. Given this, it is predicted that nascent peptides should be abundant in these granules. Nascent peptides can be visualized in real time by the SunTag system. Using this system, we observe nascent peptides in neuronal processes that are resistant to runoff with the initiation inhibitor homoharringtonin (HHT) and to release by puromycin, properties expected from RNA granules consisting of stalled polysomes. In contrast, nascent peptides in nonneuronal cells and neuronal cell bodies were not resistant to HHT or puromycin. Stalled polysomes can also be visualized after runoff with ribopuromycylation and the RNA granules imaged with ribopuromycylation were the same as those with SunTag visualized nascent peptides. Accordingly, the ribopuromycylated puncta in neuronal dendrites were also resistant to puromycin. Thus, the SunTag technique corroborates in situ evidence of stalled polysomes and will allow for the live examination of these translational structures as a mechanism for mRNA transport and regulated protein synthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it