MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968979426 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.022

BSCI-26. COMPARATIVE METHYLATION PROFILING OF EGFR MUTANT LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA AND PAIRED BRAIN METASTASIS

2019· article· en· W2968979426 on OpenAlexaff
Yasin Mamatjan, Jeffrey Zuccato, Shirin Karimi, Michael Cabanero, Jessica Weiss, Hadas Sorotsky, Ming‐Sound Tsao, Frances A. Shepherd, Kenneth Aldape, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrain metastasisLung cancerCpG siteMetastasisCancer researchAdenocarcinomaBiologyDNA methylationMethylationLungOncologyPathologyMedicineInternal medicineGeneCancerGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinomas (ADC) are the most common lung tumours and EGFR-mutant lesions have a higher risk of brain metastasis development, which confers poorer survival. Genetic and epigenetic signatures of brain metastasis have not been comprehensively identified. The aim of this study is to compare the methylome of EGFR-mutant primary lung tumor and matched brain metastasis to identify mechanisms of brain metastasis and new treatment targets. METHOD: Seven matched primary to brain metastasis tumours were profiled using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analyses (PCA) were performed using most variable CpG sites. Supervised analyses were performed between lung and brain tumour samples. Copy number variation (CNV) plots identified alterations between pairs along with Leukocytes unmethylation for purity (LUMP) score and prediction lymphocyte proportion analyses to measure immune infiltration. RESULTS: Unsupervised clustering showed that the fourteen tumours clustered according to patient with similar methylation profiles between each of seven matched pairs. On the supervised analysis using 83K significant CpG sites, the fourteen samples clustered into two groups based on tumour site being lung or brain. Of these 83K CpG sites, 2.4K were either hypermethylated or hypomethylated in all lung samples. One quarter of these 2.4K CpG sites were located in promoter regions. CNV analyses showed losses of FGFR1, C19MC, CDKN2A, PTCH1, and MYCN genes with higher deep deletions in brain versus lung primary samples. Immune infiltration measures were similar between lung and brain metastasis pairs (LUMP-score=0.64) consistent with high immune cell infiltration. CONCLUSION: In this EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas and matched brain metastases, differentially methylated CpG sites and CNV alterations are identified that distinguish lung from brain samples. Further work with additional matched samples may further elucidate signatures specific to brain metastasis and aid in our understanding of the mechanisms of brain metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207