MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974506824 · doi:10.5539/elt.v12n10p65

Relationships of International Students’ L2 Vocabulary, Receptive Skills, and Strategy Use: A Pathway College Context

2019· article· en· W2974506824 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tasnima Aktar, Dina Strong

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language Teaching · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSecond Language Acquisition and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocabularyPsychologyActive listeningReading (process)Context (archaeology)Reading comprehensionTest (biology)Mathematics educationLinguisticsCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A considerable amount of studies has been done on the relationship of L2 vocabulary and reading/listening, strategy use and reading/listening, and vocabulary and strategy use in different contexts among different levels of learners; however, little has been known about the relationships among all these variables with the same cohort of learners and particularly with international students including Asian students in a UK pathway college context. Furthermore, existing research on these relationships is inconclusive. This paucity and inconclusiveness invoke this attempt to understand the relationships of all these variables among pre-sessional international students. Quantitative data were collected from 31 Pre-Undergraduate (PU) and Pre-Masters (PM) international students via Strategy Inventory of Language Learning (SILL; Oxford, 1990), IELTS-style reading and listening tests, and an academic vocabulary test designed from Quizlet for class test. Results showed that there was no significant relation of vocabulary with reading and listening among the whole cohort of students and the PU group; however, there was a significant relationship between reading and listening among the whole cohort and the PU group. Among the PM group only, significant relationship was seen between vocabulary and reading. Social strategy category and some individual strategies were significantly correlated with reading among the whole cohort, and the significant correlation of social strategy category and reading was also true for the PM group. While memory strategies were significantly, positively correlated with vocabulary among the PM group, affective strategies were negatively correlated vocabulary among the PU group. Independent sample t-test revealed significant difference between the PM and PU groups on their vocabulary knowledge. Although the pattern of the relationships revealed was not always clear among these diverse international students, the findings could inform teaching L2 receptive skills with regards to vocabulary and strategies, with a view to facilitate learning of English as an L2 in a target language context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language TeachingSame topicSecond Language Acquisition and LearningFrench-language works237,207