MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981827178 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.729

661. Ibalizumab Efficacy and Safety Through 48 Weeks of Treatment: Results of an Expanded Access Protocol (TMB-311)

2019· article· en· W2981827178 on OpenAlexaff
Brinda Emu, Edwin DeJesus, Mezgebe Berhe, Jason Leider, Catherine Creticos, Steve Weinheimer, Zvi R. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsTheratechnologies (Canada)
FundersSamsung
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityRegimenViral loadInternal medicineCohortHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Adverse effectImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ibalizumab (IBA), a humanized monoclonal antibody, is the first CD4-directed post-attachment HIV-1 inhibitor. It was approved by the FDA in March 2018 based on results from the pivotal Phase 3 TMB-301 clinical study. The TMB-311 expanded access protocol Cohort 2 enrolled treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1 infection to further evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of IBA in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR). Here, we report the results through 48 weeks of treatment in these patients. Methods Major eligibility criteria included HIV-1 viral load (VL) >1000 copies/mL, resistance to ≥1 antiretroviral (ARV) medication from three different ARV classes and full viral sensitivity to ≥1 ARV agent. Treatment started with IBA 2000 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 0 and then 800 mg IV (maintenance) every 2 weeks thereafter. OBR with ≥1 fully active agent also started at Day 0. Results Cohort 2 enrolled 38 patients with a median age of 53 years, mostly male (87%) and white (53%). At Baseline, median VL was 4.7 log10 copies/mL, CD4 cell count was 26 cells/mm3 and overall susceptibility score of 1. A ≥0.5 log10 decrease in VL from Baseline was achieved in 28 of 37 patients (76%) at Day 7. Of 24 patients who completed the Week 24 visit, 11 (46%) had HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL. Of 17 patients with a VL assessment at Week 48, 8 (47%) achieved <50 copies/mL. Seven patients did not have a Week 48 endpoint because they withdrew from the study to receive commercial IBA. At both time points, the median change in VL from Baseline was -2.6 log10 copies/mL. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (24%), headache (21%), and nausea, cough, rash, and fatigue (16% each). No injection site reactions related to IBA were reported. Most events were mild; 9 patients reported Grade ≥3 TEAEs. Two events were fatal (sepsis and cardiac arrest); neither related to IBA. One event of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome was reported and considered possibly related to IBA. Conclusion Results from Cohort 2 patients of TMB-311 (IBA + OBR) demonstrate durable viral suppression in this difficult-to-treat patient population and with a safety profile consistent with pivotal Phase 3 study of IBA. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207