661. Ibalizumab Efficacy and Safety Through 48 Weeks of Treatment: Results of an Expanded Access Protocol (TMB-311)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Ibalizumab (IBA), a humanized monoclonal antibody, is the first CD4-directed post-attachment HIV-1 inhibitor. It was approved by the FDA in March 2018 based on results from the pivotal Phase 3 TMB-301 clinical study. The TMB-311 expanded access protocol Cohort 2 enrolled treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1 infection to further evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of IBA in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR). Here, we report the results through 48 weeks of treatment in these patients. Methods Major eligibility criteria included HIV-1 viral load (VL) >1000 copies/mL, resistance to ≥1 antiretroviral (ARV) medication from three different ARV classes and full viral sensitivity to ≥1 ARV agent. Treatment started with IBA 2000 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 0 and then 800 mg IV (maintenance) every 2 weeks thereafter. OBR with ≥1 fully active agent also started at Day 0. Results Cohort 2 enrolled 38 patients with a median age of 53 years, mostly male (87%) and white (53%). At Baseline, median VL was 4.7 log10 copies/mL, CD4 cell count was 26 cells/mm3 and overall susceptibility score of 1. A ≥0.5 log10 decrease in VL from Baseline was achieved in 28 of 37 patients (76%) at Day 7. Of 24 patients who completed the Week 24 visit, 11 (46%) had HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL. Of 17 patients with a VL assessment at Week 48, 8 (47%) achieved <50 copies/mL. Seven patients did not have a Week 48 endpoint because they withdrew from the study to receive commercial IBA. At both time points, the median change in VL from Baseline was -2.6 log10 copies/mL. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (24%), headache (21%), and nausea, cough, rash, and fatigue (16% each). No injection site reactions related to IBA were reported. Most events were mild; 9 patients reported Grade ≥3 TEAEs. Two events were fatal (sepsis and cardiac arrest); neither related to IBA. One event of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome was reported and considered possibly related to IBA. Conclusion Results from Cohort 2 patients of TMB-311 (IBA + OBR) demonstrate durable viral suppression in this difficult-to-treat patient population and with a safety profile consistent with pivotal Phase 3 study of IBA. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".