MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2982688826

Policy Forum: Taxing Non-Residents' Residences — A Critical View of the Laws Behind the New Realty Taxes in British Columbia and Ontario

2018· preprint· en· W2982688826 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Noah Sarna, Zheting Su

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeculationLegislationLegislatureStatuteTax reformTax avoidanceAd valorem taxValue-added taxEconomicsIndirect taxTax policyDirect taxTax lawTax creditPublic economicsPolitical scienceLawFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Years of rapidly escalating home prices in British Columbia and Ontario have spurred governments in each province to introduce unique housing-related taxes, including British Columbia's foreign buyer tax, Ontario's non-resident speculation tax, and Vancouver's vacancy tax (also known as the empty homes tax). The central goals of these taxes are to encourage greater rental stock and to restrain market demand generally by imposing hefty tax burdens on foreign ownership. British Columbia's recent provincial budget continued this trend by, among other things, expanding the foreign buyer tax and introducing a speculation tax. This article presents a critical analysis of the statutes and bylaws governing these taxes. These pieces of legislation have attracted little attention relative to larger political and economic issues associated with each new regime, even though they are central to the operation of each tax. They have presented a considerable challenge to tax practitioners, who have generally had to encounter them with no guiding case law, commentary, or legislative precedents. The authors describe the legal nature and framework of each tax, review core concepts, and identify various interpretive issues. They also consider the administration of each tax, primarily on the basis of their practical experience. The authors conclude that certain legislative and administrative components of each tax demonstrate an overall intention by the enacting governments to prioritize a quick, as opposed to a comprehensive, implementation process. This suggests a desire to achieve immediate policy objectives through the imposition of the taxes, even if the legislation essentially remains a work in progress. This is consistent with the view that, since no clear success metrics have been offered, these new regimes will be part of our tax landscape for the long term, no matter how rental rates or home values might fare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0430.013
Scholarly communication0.0160.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicCanadian Policy and Governance→French-language works237,207→