MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987490438 · doi:10.1111/gtc.12736

Characterization of genetic‐origin‐dependent monoallelic expression in mouse embryonic stem cells

2019· article· en· W2987490438 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroaki Ohishi, Wan Kin Au Yeung, Motoko Unoki, Kenji Ichiyanagi, Kei Fukuda, Shoji Maenohara, Kenjiro Shirane, Hatsune Chiba, Takashi Sado, Hiroyuki Sasaki

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes to Cells · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTakeda Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologyEpigeneticsEmbryonic stem cellGeneticsGenomic imprintingRetrotransposonGeneAlleleInduced pluripotent stem cellX-inactivationDNA methylationGene expressionX chromosomeTransposable elementGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monoallelic gene expression occurs in various mammalian cells and can be regulated genetically, epigenetically and/or stochastically. We identified 145 monoallelically expressed genes (MoEGs), including seven known imprinted genes, in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) derived from reciprocal F1 hybrid blastocysts and cultured in 2i/LIF. As all MoEGs except for the imprinted genes were expressed in a genetic-origin-dependent manner, we focused on this class of MoEGs for mechanistic studies. We showed that a majority of the genetic-origin-dependent MoEGs identified in 2i/LIF ESCs remain monoallelically expressed in serum/LIF ESCs, but become more relaxed or even biallelically expressed upon differentiation. These MoEGs and their regulatory regions were highly enriched for single nucleotide polymorphisms. In addition, some MoEGs were associated with retrotransposon insertions/deletions, consistent with the fact that certain retrotransposons act as regulatory elements in pluripotent stem cells. Interestingly, most MoEGs showed allelic differences in enrichment of histone H3K27me and H3K4me marks, linking allelic epigenetic differences and monoallelic expression. In contrast, there was little or no allelic difference in CpG methylation or H3K9me. Taken together, our study highlights the impact of genetic variation including single nucleotide polymorphisms and retrotransposon insertions/deletions on monoallelic epigenetic marks and expression in ESCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes to CellsSame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207