MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract C048: Novel master checkpoint Cbl-b siRNA-based adoptive cellular therapy: Superior antitumor efficacy in a syngeneic murine hepatocellular carcinoma Hepa1-6 model following APN401 monotherapy and synergistic effects with anti-PD1

2019· article· en· W2993613817 on OpenAlexaff
Anderson S. Gaweco, Kathrin Thell, Maria Cristina Cocenza Urban, Julia Harrauer, Isabella Haslinger, Alexander Dohnal, Guenther Lametschwandtner, Karin Drobits, Romana Gugenberger, Hannes Muehleisen, Josef Penninger, Carlos Becerra, Vincent Chung, Anthony B. El-Khoueiry

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchIn vivoImmune systemImmunotherapyMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaCancerImmunologyPharmacologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b is an intracellular master checkpoint which negatively regulates both adaptive and innate anti-tumor immune responses. Selective targeting of Cbl-b not only induces anti-tumor activity in vivo but also overrides immune regulation by the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway in vitro (2017 Fujiwara et al). Human APN401 is an autologous adoptive cellular therapy of ex vivo Cbl-b-silenced human PBMCs currently in a clinical Phase 1b multiple dose study demonstrating early clinical safety and tolerability in patients with advanced solid tumors. Herein the preclinical Proof of Concept efficacy of murine APN401 immunotherapy is established in the syngeneic mouse hepatocellular carcinoma Hepa1-6 model. Experimental Procedure: Hepa1-6-C57/BL6-tumor bearing mice were treated with murine APN401 ex vivo silenced immune cells with Cbl-b specific siRNA as monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD1 (clone RMP1-14) versus control siRNA. Mice were treated for 14 d starting on D7 after inoculation of Hepa1-6 cells and tumor volume was measured daily. Results: Murine APN401 treatment alone significantly suppressed Hepa1-6 tumor growth by 56% (p<0.0001) versus control siRNA-treated mice. Combination therapy of APN401 with anti-PD1 induced profound synergistic anti-tumor efficacy with tumor growth inhibition of 76% (p<0.0001) versus anti-PD1 alone with control siRNA. APN401 was well tolerated and APN401-treated mice were unremarkable with optimal body conditions. Conclusion: APN401 monotherapy demonstrates striking anti-tumor efficacy in suppressing tumor growth in a murine hepatocellular carcinoma Hepa1-6 model. The preclinical synergistic effects of APN401 with anti-PD1 support its therapeutic utility as a combination therapy with immune checkpoint anti-PD1 treatment. These findings highlight the potential promise of selective Cbl-b silencing by APN401 as a novel immunotherapy for cancer. Citation Format: Anderson Gaweco, Kathrin Thell, Maria Urban, Julia Harrauer, Isabella Haslinger, Alexander Dohnal, Guenther Lametschwandtner, Karin Drobits, Romana Gugenberger, Hannes Muehleisen, Josef Penninger, Carlos Becerra, Vincent Chung, Anthony El-Khoueiry. Novel master checkpoint Cbl-b siRNA-based adoptive cellular therapy: Superior antitumor efficacy in a syngeneic murine hepatocellular carcinoma Hepa1-6 model following APN401 monotherapy and synergistic effects with anti-PD1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C048. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-C048

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207