MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Simple Two-Step Method for the Isolation of Human CD4+CD25+bright / FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells Directly from Whole Blood.

2005· article· en· W2994447848 on OpenAlexaff
Benoit Guilbault, Maureen Fairhurst, Natasha K. Crellin, Megan K. Levings, Allen Eaves, Terry E. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research InstituteVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteVancouver Coastal HealthStemcell Technologies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFicollIL-2 receptorCell sortingImmunomagnetic separationBiologyMolecular biologyFOXP3CentrifugationT cellDifferential centrifugationAntibodyPeripheral blood mononuclear cellCell biologyImmune systemImmunologyFlow cytometryIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (TR) have the ability to suppress T cell responses and have recently been shown to play a critical role in peripheral tolerance and regulation of immune responses. CD4+CD25+ TR are anergic, phenotypically CD25+bright and express high levels of the transcription factor FOXP3. Peripheral blood TR are rare and must be highly enriched for their suppressor function to be detected in vitro. This, combined with the lack of a unique marker that distinguishes them from activated T cells, makes it difficult to study TR function and evaluate their therapeutic potential. Current methods for isolating TR are cumbersome and time-consuming, and generally require three steps: Ficoll™ density centrifugation to isolate mononuclear cells; subsequent immunomagnetic T cell enrichment; and finally FACS sorting. The objective of this study was to develop a more simple technique to isolate highly purified TR from whole blood without using FACS sorting. Three steps were reduced to two by replacing the Ficoll™ separation and immunomagnetic T cell enrichment with a single antibody-mediated buoyant density centrifugation (RosetteSep®) to enrich CD4 T cells directly from whole blood. A cocktail of bi-specific antibodies was used to selectively bind unwanted cells to red cells causing them to pellet when centrifuged over Ficoll™. Purified CD4 T cells were recovered at the plasma-Ficoll™ interface and then separated using EasySep® column-free magnetic separation to select CD25 expressing cells. The EasySep® separation conditions were optimized for maximal CD4+CD25+bright T cell purity and recovery. The purified cells were analyzed for CD25, GITR, CD62L, HLA-DR and CTLA-4 expression. FOXP3 mRNA levels in purified CD4+CD25+ T cell fractions were compared to corresponding CD4+CD25neg T cell fractions using quantitative PCR. As TR are anergic and therefore not responsive to TCR stimulation, the purified CD4+CD25+ T cell fractions were assessed for anergy in response to anti-CD3/CD28 coated beads. Suppression activity of purified CD4+CD25+ T cells was assessed by measuring their ability to reduce the proliferative response of CD4+CD25neg T cells to CD3/CD28 beads. T cell proliferation was quantified by measuring dilution of the fluorescent dye CFSE with flow cytometry. Purified CD4+CD25+ T cell suspensions were 94 ± 3% (n=6) CD4+CD25+, 83 ± 7% (n=6) CD4+CD25+bright, 89 ± 2% (n=4) GITR+ and CD62L+ (92%, 95%; n=2). The purified cell suspensions were also highly enriched for CTLA-4 and HLA-DR expressing cells. FOXP3 mRNA levels in the purified CD4+CD25+ T cell fractions from two donors were found to be 64 and 124 times higher than for the corresponding CD4+CD25neg T cell fractions. The purified CD4+CD25+ T cells displayed low or undetectable proliferative responses (n=4) to CD3/CD28 beads suggesting most cells in the purified fractions were anergic. Mixing purified CD4+CD25+ T cells with CD4+CD25neg T cells at a ratio of 1:1 almost completely eliminated detectable CD4+CD25neg T cell proliferation (95 ± 3 % reduction, n=3), and suppression of proliferation continued to be detected when cells were mixed at a ratio of 1:10 (25 ± 6% reduction, n=3). In conclusion, combining RosetteSep® CD4 T cell enrichment with EasySep® CD25 positive selection yields highly pure CD4+CD25+bright / FOXP3+ TR in less time and with fewer steps than current isolation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→