An assessment of degree-day models to predict the phenology of alfalfa weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on the Canadian Prairies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study examined the use of degree-day models to predict alfalfa weevil Hypera postica (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) population development on the Canadian prairies. Air temperatures, alfalfa weevil abundance, and instar data were collected in 2013 and 2014 from 13 alfalfa ( Medicago sativa Linnaeus; Fabaceae) fields across Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. We coupled three alfalfa weevil population prediction models with three temperature data sources to determine which combination most closely aligned with results observed. Our objective was to find the best prediction of peak occurrence of second instar alfalfa weevils, the optimum time for management decisions. Of the parameters analysed, prediction model had the greatest effect on the accuracy of peak instar prediction, with Harcourt and North Dakota models better at predicting population peaks than the Guppy–Mukerji model. Interactions between temperature source and prediction model significantly affected prediction accuracy. The probability of accurate prediction of population peaks to within 3.5 days of actual occurrence using in-field and multiple-site temperature data sets, combined with Harcourt and North Dakota development models, was 0.45–0.70. Lower predictability was found from fields in the Mixed Grass Ecoregion than in other ecoregions. The use of the recommended models can assist growers in timing their monitoring activities and deciding if pest management action is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".