MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3001804163 · doi:10.1088/1361-6439/ab6dbd

On the fabrication of thin-film artificial metal grid resonator antenna arrays using deep x-ray Lithography

2020· article· en· W3001804163 on OpenAlexafffund
Waqas Mazhar, David M. Klymyshyn, Sven Achenbach, Aqeel A. Qureshi, Garth Wells, Michael Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Light Source
KeywordsFabricationLithographyMaterials scienceResonatorX-ray lithographyAntenna (radio)PhotolithographyGridOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyEngineeringElectrical engineeringResistGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a unique microfabrication approach for designing high permittivity, high gain and wideband thin-film artificial metal grid dielectric resonator antenna (GDRA) arrays for mm-wave applications is presented. Fabrication of the GDRAs with a strip template frame is based on deep-x-ray lithography (DXRL) using a 500 µ m thick polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) layer as the photoresist. The simple low-cost fabricated DXRL mask for exposure consisted of gold absorbers patterned by direct-write ultraviolet (UV) laser lithography on a carbon substrate. To avoid the trapping of gas bubbles in the dense, high aspect ratio (HAR) deep grid structures, a novel development approach was introduced utilizing in-vacuum, room temperature dip development to facilitate the collapse of forming gas bubbles. The developed voids were subsequently electroplated to a nickel thickness of 300 µ m to obtain high permittivity artificial dielectrics. The paper describes the entire fabrication sequence. Also, the x-ray mask and DXRL structures are examined for dimensional accuracy and structural quality. This strip template frame approach has superior performance in terms of impedance bandwidth, gain and radiation efficiency as compared to the previously published solid template frame approach. For the purpose of the demonstration, a four-element GDRA array sample was fabricated and tested. A wide measured impedance bandwidth of 5 GHz from 58 GHz to 63 GHz and measured broadside radiation pattern with a peak gain of 10.9 dBi was achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micromechanics and MicroengineeringSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207