Design and characterization of compact digital RF MEMS capacitors and phase shifters in CMOS 0.35 <i>µ</i> m technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work reports on the design, fabrication and characterization of compact digital RF MEMS capacitors and phase shifters that are built in the back end of line (BEOL) of CMOS 0.35 µ m technology. The devices are micromachined using a maskless post-processing sequence with cryogenic cooling on to control the out-of-plane warping of the metal-oxide structural layers. The implemented vertical electrostatic actuation in the developed post process allows the realization of highly compact designs of both devices, and an operating voltage of the devices is stay below 70 V. The 4-bit capacitors provide a measured tuning ratio close to 10:1 which corresponds to 0.15 pF to 1.2 pF over the frequency range 3–10 GHz. The overall footprint of the digital capacitor is 0.6 mm × 0.9 mm. The measured quality factor after de-embedding the losses due to the RF probing pads is up to 120. The measurement of the 4-bit phase shifters reveals low insertion loss <3 dB at 20 GHz along with low variation of the insertion loss <1 dB up to the same frequency. The measured phase shift is 150 at 20 GHz. The overall footprint of the 4-bit phase shifter is around 1 mm × 1 mm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".