New Approaches to SCLC Therapy: From the Laboratory to the Clinic
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- Research integrity
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Not applicableConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: ReviewConsensus signal: Review
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.709
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 1.000
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Topic
- Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
- Funders
- Janssen PharmaceuticalsNational Cancer InstituteNational Health and Medical Research CouncilDaiichi Sankyo EuropeAgios PharmaceuticalsKarolinska InstitutetTakeda OncologyEMD SeronoIpsenPharmaMarAstellas PharmaMerckKyowa Hakko KirinDaiichi-SankyoSyndax PharmaceuticalsCancer Research UKAstraZenecaInternational Association for the Study of Lung CancerGenentechANGLEBayer FundMeso Scale DiagnosticsAstex PharmaceuticalsTG TherapeuticsAeglea BioTherapeuticsPfizer PharmaceuticalsMarshfield Clinic Research FoundationMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterMerck KGaANational Institutes of HealthRegeneron PharmaceuticalsVictorian Cancer AgencyIncyteMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterAbbVieCelgeneNovartisFoundation MedicineGlaxoSmithKlineEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbG1 TherapeuticsLung Cancer Research FoundationCold Spring Harbor LaboratoryRocheAstellas Pharma USAmgenAriad PharmaceuticalsBoehringer IngelheimPfizer
- Keywords
- MedicineIntensive care medicineLung cancerClinical trialImmunotherapyDiseaseOncologyCancerInternal medicine
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no