MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004209596 · doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00836

Rare Carbon-Bridged Bimetallic Lanthanide (Nd or Sm) and Tl(I) Geminal Carbon Derivatives of a Bis(iminophosphorano)methanediide

2020· article· en· W3004209596 on OpenAlexafffund
Sai Ge, Jianguo Zhao, Michael J. Ferguson, Guibin Ma, Ronald G. Cavell

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsChemistryGeminalBimetallic stripLanthanideCrystallographyParamagnetismLigand (biochemistry)MetalCrystal structureCarbon fibersMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bimetallic carbon-bridged bis(iminophosphorano)methanediide complexes [CpNd(Tl){C(Ph 2 P═NSiMe 3 ) 2 }Cl 2 Li(THF) 2 ]·Et 2 O ( 2 ) and [SmCl 3 Tl{C(Ph 2 P═NSiMe 3 ) 2 }Li(THF) 2 ] 2 ( 3 ) were prepared from reactions of the dilithiated bis(iminophosphorano)methanediide [Li 2 L] ( 1; L = C 2– (Ph 2 P═NSiMe 3 ) 2 ) with Nd and Sm chlorides and with CpTl and TlCl, respectively, in THF. Both final products contain coordinated Li linked with Cl bridges. The complexes have been structurally characterized and show that the bridging methanediide backbone carbon of the ligand is substituted with one Tl(I) and one rare-earth atom and has a tetrahedral geometry. The 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectrum (THF- d 8 ) of 2 shows a broad signal at 13.75 ppm with a two-bond spin–spin coupling ( 2 J Tl–P = 410 Hz), indicating that the C–Tl bond is maintained in solution. The 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectrum of 3 was less informative because the complex is more paramagnetic, and thus only a very broad single peak was observed. DFT calculations on the model compounds [CpNd(Tl){C(PhMeP═NSiH 3 ) 2 }Cl 2 Li(THF) 2 ] ( 2a ) and [SmTl{C(PhMeP═NSiH 3 ) 2 Cl 2 ] 2 ( 3a ), whose crystal structures are based on those for 2 and 3, were performed; the results clearly demonstrate the bonding characteristics among the metal centers (Nd(III), Sm(III), Tl(I)) and bridged carbon. In contrast to most Tl(I) compounds, 2 and 3 are reasonably stable in air; this is attributed to protection of the Tl(I) by some of the phenyl substituents on the phosphorus through π-bonding interactions. X-ray and DFT data indicate that, for 2, Tl(I) is a five-coordinate center through one strong carbene carbon bond and four weak phenyl carbon bonds, while for 3, Tl(I) is six-coordinate through strong carbene carbon and chloride bonds and four weak phenyl carbon bonds. These complexes are the first examples of a single carbon or carbene forming a bridge between the main-group heavy metal Tl(I) and another rare-earth metal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207