MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PF427 FOSTAMATINIB, A SPLEEN TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR, FOR THE TREATMENT OF WARM ANTIBODY AUTOIMMUNE HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA: INITIAL RESULTS OF THE OPEN‐LABEL EXTENSION PERIOD OF THE SOAR PHASE 2 STUDY

2019· article· en· W3006397179 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Kuter, A. Richy, Michael Boxer, Catherine M. Broome, Donald M. Arnold, Joshua J. Field, Irina Murakhovskaya, Kerry A. Rogers, Ann M. Lowe, Robert P. Numerof, Hany Zayed, Sandy Tong, Anne‐Marie Duliège

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutoimmune hemolytic anemiaSykClinical endpointAnemiaInternal medicineGastroenterologyAntibodyImmunologyTyrosine kinaseClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) is a rare and often serious disease resulting from antibody‐mediated destruction of red blood cells (RBCs). The SYK inhibitor, fostamatinib, markedly improved Hgb levels in patients with wAIHA during a phase 2, open‐label, multicenter study, in which 9 of 21 (43%) met the primary endpoint (Hgb >10 g/dL with an increase of ≥2 g/dL from baseline by Week 24 without rescue therapy or RBC transfusion). Aims: We report the results of the ongoing extension period of the study. Methods: Adults with primary or secondary wAIHA had to have failed ≥1 prior treatment for wAIHA, have hemoglobin (Hgb) <10 g/dL, an IgG‐positive direct antiglobulin test, haptoglobin <10 mg/dL, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >ULN. Fostamatinib 150 mg BID was taken orally with no food restriction (dose reduction permitted based on tolerability). To enter the extension, patients had to meet the primary endpoint OR show a marked improvement in Hgb and had to have tolerated study drug. Results: Nine patients who completed the initial treatment phase entered the extension: 7 patients met the primary endpoint, 1 was a late responder, and 1 had a beneficial trend during the initial treatment phase. For baseline characteristics, see table. Median Hgb levels increased over the study. Five of 9 patients have an ongoing response to fostamatinib as of July 2018, and none have had rescue therapy or an RBC transfusion. Six of 9 patients are still on the study, and 3 discontinued due to lack of response plus AE (1), consent withdrawn (1), and unknown (1). Nine patients had ≥1 AE, 6 with treatment‐related AEs. AEs were mostly mild to moderate, and the most common AEs were diarrhea and upper respiratory tract infection. Three Grade 3 AEs were reported in 2 patients. AEs resulted in dose reduction in 2 patients, dose interruption in 2, and study drug withdrawn in 1. Summary/Conclusion: Fostamatinib markedly improved Hgb levels in 9 of 21 (43%) patients with wAIHA during a phase 2, open‐label, multicenter study. Adverse events (AE) were manageable and consistent with those previously reported for fostamatinib in other conditions. A randomized, placebo‐controlled, Phase 3 trial is underway. image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207