MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tocilizumab for the Management of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) Treated with CAR T-Cell Therapy, CTL019

2017· article· en· W3007071335 on OpenAlexaff
Clarice Lee, Henrique Bittencourt, Susana Rives, Michael W. Boyer, Michael A. Pulsipher, Michael R. Verneris, Gregory A. Yanik, Birgit Jaitner, Lan Yi, Kathryn Lund, Mimi Leung, Rakesh Awasthi, Patricia A. Wood, Shannon L. Maude, Stephan A. Grupp, Karen Thudium Mueller

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacodynamicsMedicineCytokine release syndromePharmacokineticsTocilizumabInternal medicinePharmacologyOncologyCancerImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: ELIANA (NCT02435849) is a pivotal multicenter study to test the efficacy of CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel; anti-CD19 CAR-T) in children and young adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Tocilizumab (toci) has been used for the management of moderate/severe (grade 3/4) CRS in ≈ 38% of pts treated with CTL019 (Buechner J et al, EHA 2017) at the same doses used in approved non-oncologic pediatric indications ( Objectives: To characterize the PK/PD of toci for the management of CRS following CTL019 infusion in B-ALL in the ELIANA study. To describe the impact of toci on CTL019 cellular kinetics and expansion. Methods: Pharmacokinetics of toci and pharmacodynamics of soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R) concentrations (conc) were determined from serum and quantified using validated assays to provide mechanistic support for the use of toci in the management of CRS in B-ALL. Maximum toci conc (Cmax) was derived using non-compartmental methods and compared with levels in approved indications. sIL-6R, proinflammatory cytokines and time to CRS resolution were characterized to describe the pharmacodynamic effects of toci. Summary statistics and graphical analyses of CTL019 exposure by number of toci doses were performed for patients that responded to CTL019 infusion to describe the impact of toci on CTL019 expansion and persistence. Results: A total of 28 out of 58 pts with CRS received their first dose of toci at a median of 5 days (range 1-18) after CRS onset. 17 pts received 1 IV dose of toci; 8 pts 2 doses; 3 pts 3 doses. First dose of toci ranged from 6.9 to 12 mg/kg; second dose of toci ranged from 8 to 12 mg/kg. Following the first and second dose of toci, the mean Cmax (SD) were ≈ 111 (30.6) µg/mL and 265 (376) µg/mL, respectively (Table 1). Individual patient PK/PD concentration-time profiles in B-ALL, show increased sIL-6R after the first toci dose that remained elevated following the second dose (Figure 2). The median time to CRS resolution (including fever resolution) was 5 days (range, 2-29 days) after toci administration. CRS onset coincided with CTL019 expansion, and was followed by a peak in serum cytokines, including IL-6. Maximal expansion of the CTL019 transgene (determined by qPCR) was 159% higher in patients treated with toci (n=14) compared with patients that did not receive toci (n=28) demonstrating tocilizumab does not negatively impact expansion (Figure 3). Conclusions: Toci administration resulted in resolution of CRS symptoms within a median of 5 days after administration. Notably, levels of toci achieved in B-ALL were similar to levels published in pediatric non-oncologic indications [tocilizumab label], resulting in concentration- and time-dependent increases in sIL-6R. CTL019 transgene expanded and persisted following tocilizumab administration. Together these data support the use of toci for the management of CRS, showing the compound to be 1) pharmacologically active, 2) able to achieve levels consistent with those achieved in other disorders in spite of CRS and 3) able to be given without impairing CTL019 expansion. Download : Download high-res image (151KB) Download : Download full-size image Disclosures Lee: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Other: Post-Doctoral Fellow; The State University of New Jersey: Other: Post doctoral fellow. Bittencourt: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Grant. Rives: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Other: Travel expenses; Shire: Consultancy. Boyer: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria. Pulsipher: Adaptive: Other: Advisory board 6/17; CSL Behring: Other: advisory board Feb 2017; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: advisory board, education; Chimerix: Other: Advisory board Dec 2015; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Phase II steering committee. Jaitner: Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Yi: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Lund: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Leung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Awasthi: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Wood: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Maude: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Medical Advisory Boards. Grupp: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Other: grant; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties. Mueller: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207