MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008290326 · doi:10.1111/jpim.12519

From the Editors: Reflecting on the Value of a Doctoral Consortium

2020· article· en· W3008290326 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Charles H. Noble, Jelena Spanjol

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Product Innovation Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstStockholms UniversitetDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenUniversität des SaarlandesEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichTechnische Universiteit EindhovenKorea UniversityUniversity of New South WalesTrent UniversityWilfrid Laurier UniversitySungkyunkwan UniversityTemple UniversityUniversity of WyomingMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityTowson UniversityWest Virginia UniversityCalifornia State University, FullertonUniversity of SussexCopenhagen Business SchoolNirma UniversityRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteMichigan Technological UniversityGeorgia State UniversityUniversidade de São PauloUniversity of CincinnatiUniversity of PittsburghCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of GeorgiaSouth Dakota State UniversityUniversity of Washington BothellUniversity of MissouriUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMichigan State UniversityWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterAppalachian State UniversityUniversität MannheimIowa State UniversityAston UniversityUniversity of Notre DameEwha Womans UniversityHankuk University of Foreign StudiesMidwestern State UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsCitationValue (mathematics)Library scienceComputer scienceManagementSociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This issue begins with an insightful essay by Rindfleisch, Mehta, Sachdev, and Danienta (2020) who, with their

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.086
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.086
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0180.009
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0060.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Product Innovation ManagementSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207